is a voluntary organisation committed to reducing the gender pay gap in New Zealand through policy and initiatives to advance pay equity in general and equal pay for work of equal value in particular.
Our members' expertise and experience spans the breadth and history of this important policy issue. The purpose of this website is to provide background information for the current campaign and for the media.
CEVEP has campaigned for effective pay equity policy and legislation since 1986. Our activities include advocating to government and political parties, writing submissions and appearing before select committees, producing materials on pay equity for the public and the media, and organising tours of overseas experts to New Zealand.
In April 2013, CEVEP was invited to be an 'intervening' party to a pay equity test case taken under the Equal Pay Act 1972 by resthome caregiver Kristine Bartlett and the Service & Food Workers Union (now called E Tu).
CEVEP is an active member
For the latest news on the Pay Equity Challenge, see the Coalition's website, blog and RSS feed.
The Pay Equity Challenge Coalition is a broad coalition of community, employer, union, and academic groups who are committed to putting pay equity issues back on the government's, and New Zealand's, agenda.
CEVEP supports the Working Women's Charter, adopted by the Federation of Labour and Public Service Association back in 1980 - and still very relevant to working women today.
The June 2020 income statistics show that New Zealand women earned on average $30.30 an hour compared with an average of $33.77 for men - that is, the average hourly rate for women 's work is now 90% of that for men. This is a narrowing of the gender pay gap by 1-2 percentage points since June 2019, and by 3-4 percentage points since 2017. The medians were $25.57 and $28.25 for women and men respectively (no improvement). However, these 2020 statistics are distorted by Covid-19 job losses which have disproportinately affected job paid women's jobs, in retail, food and accommodation sectors - see discussion here.
A personal history of equal Pay
CEVEP member Elizabeth Orr has been a pay equity activist since the 1960s. Her memoire Pay Packets and Stone Walls, published in February 2020, is not only an account of a long and colourful life, but an invaluable history of the long struggle to achieve equal pay for New Zealand women. Still struggling...
Elizabeth speaking at launch,
Contact CEVEP at email@example.com
www.cevepnz.org.nz, 12 November 2020
On 22 July 2020, Parliament passed the 2018 Equal Pay Amendment Bill, which came into force on 7 November 2020. This Bill amends the Equal Pay Act 1972. In line with court judgments in Bartlett vs Terranova, it states more explicitly that:
The Bill provides a detailed process for taking a pay equity claim. Claimants may be an individual, or a union, or group of unions acting on behalf of members. Claims must briefly set out information in support of the claim being 'arguable' - that it is female dominated work and why it may currently be and/or has historically been undervalued. Within 45 days the employer must agree the claim is arguable or provide reasons why not. The Bill then covers how the work is to be assessed and the selection of male (or other) comparators. The process under the Equal Pay Act now aligns with 'good faith' collective bargaining under the Employment Relations Act. If the parties cannot agree on 'arguability' or other matters, the claim can be referred to mediation or (as in the 1972 Act) to the Employment Relations Authority for a Determination.
CEVEP supports the strong role for unions in the legislative changes. The process for union claims aligns with collective bargaining, and with ongoing proposals for Fair Pay Agreements covering particular occupations or sectors. However, we are concerned that the new processes may not work well for the 79% of the female workforce that is un-unionised and usually on an individual employment contract with their employer. Unions claims will automatically cover all workmates doing the same or similar work for the same employer(s), whether members or not. Those without union coverage can only each make a separate individual claims to their employer. the employer must notify workmates but may choose whether or not to extend any settlement to them - despite the 'no differentiation' principle above.
The lack of legislated processes in the 1972 Act, and lack of pay transparency, made pay equity claims difficult before the Bartlett vs Terranova rulings. This new law provides a process for non-union claims, but one with several small fishhooks likely to discourage individual claimants. Lack of transparency about occupational pay rates and about claim outcomes will continue to make it difficult for most women to know if their work is undervalued.
See here for recent gender and ethnicity equity improvements in the Public Service, June 2019.
When Kristine Bartlett took her pay equity claim in 2012, she was being paid just $14.46 an hour, after 20 years experience in the sector. The offer settling the Bartlett pay equity claim lifts care and support workers' pay to between $19 and $23.50 from 1 July 2017, rising to between $21.50 and $27 in July 2021.
Her initial claim under the Equal Pay Act 1972 was referred to the Employment Court, then the High Court, resulting in judgments clarifying that the Act did indeed allow equal pay for work of equal value claims for women's and men's typically different work. The government, which funds most care work from our taxes, then set up a Joint Working Group to develop Principles for Implementing Equal Pay and another Joint Working Group to negotiate settlement of Kristine Bartlett's claim. After 17 months a settlement was announced which the government extended agreed pay increases to 55,000 care and support workers in aged care and disability residences, with staggered implementation of new rates from 1 July 2017.
See news of other state sector pay equity claims and settlements here, with pay increases of around 30%.
Please sign the HRC's petition here.